 |
In any case in
which a marriage has broken down, there are likely to be strong feelings and tensions
between the parties, and occasionally it is found that there has been violence or threats
of violence or harassment during the course of the relationship. It is essential therefore
that there should be opportunity to make applications to the Court for emergency
protection orders, both in relation to personal safety and also occupation of a property,
in order to preserve the position pending the outcome of the case.
The law relating to emergency
procedures has recently been updated and rationalised and in relation to matrimonial
cases, now exists in Part IV of the Family Law Act 1996. Part of this Act which relates to
harassment and domestic violence has already been brought into force, and it simplifies
previous law and makes it easier for parties to obtain protection when needed.
- Non-Molestation Order
Firstly an application can be
made for a Non-Molestation Order, which can include protection against violence,
harassment or pestering. This is an extremely wide-ranging order, which can extend to
telephone calls, sending letters or messages or any action which can be regarded as
harassment of the applicant. Such an order can technically be made even if the parties
involved still reside under the same roof, although understandably, it would be extremely
difficult to monitor an order which might be made in such circumstances.
- Occupation Order
An Occupation Order would exclude
a party from the family home. The applicant needs to demonstrate that they are entitled to
occupy the home, either under the general law, or by virtue of matrimonial home rights.
The application can be made against anyone with whom the applicant is associated,
including not only a spouse but a cohabitant, former spouse or former cohabitant. In
deciding whether to make an Occupation Order excluding the other party from the property,
the Court must have regard to all the circumstances of the case, particularly the housing
needs and resources of the parties and the children, the financial resources of the
parties, and the likely effect of an order (or lack of one) on the health, safety and
well-being of the parties or relevant child. The Court has to balance the likely harm to
the applicant and any child which might be caused by not making an order with the harm to
the other spouse/partner if the order is made. It is possible for cohabitants and other
family members to claim these and other rights provided that they can show that they are
associated persons, or connected persons within the meaning of the
Act.
- Orders under the Housing Act 1966
Quite apart from the powers to
make non-molestation orders and occupation orders between parties, the Court also has
power under the Housing Act 1966 to make orders relating to what is known as
stalking. This is not limited to purely domestic situations, and a Court is
able to grant an Injunction to prevent a person engaging in conduct likely to cause a
nuisance or annoyance to a person or other anti-social behaviour which is defined by the
Act.
- Power of Arrest
Where an application for an
Injunction is made, in appropriate cases if the Court considers it just, it can grant a
Power of Arrest to be attached to the Injunction, whereby the Police are authorised and
required to arrest a person who is deemed to have breached the order. If orders are
breached by the offending party, the order can be enforced by the Court, by an application
under a Warrant for Arrest, and the offender will be brought before the Judge and required
to explain the circumstances of the alleged breach. If an order is breached, the Court has
a range of remedies and sanctions, including fines, penalties and even imprisonment in
extreme cases. Suspended orders can also be made.
- Procedure for Emergency Orders
The procedure for making
applications for emergency orders is that in an emergency the Court can consider an
application made with only one party present before the Judge at the hearing in the first
instance. This is what is known as an ex parte application. When an order is
made ex parte, the Court is bound to give the Respondent the opportunity to make
representations as soon as it is just and convenient. A follow-up hearing is then likely
to be arranged for the Injunction Order to be reviewed, and for the other party to be
allowed to make representations. The orders which the Court will make will be ordered to
last for a specified period, or until Decree Absolute, but an Occupation Order can only be
made for a maximum of six months (although this is renewable).
|